Do you implement features for us?
No. Work stays advisory and review-focused. Your engineers retain implementation; we comment on structure, interfaces, and review findings.
Kuching · Sarawak
Logic Ridge Consulting
Programming consulting for teams that need a second pair of eyes on software architecture, interface contracts, and production code before they commit to a rewrite or a major release.
Supplier disclosure
- Supplier
- Logic Ridge Consulting (SSM 202103045612)
- Address
- 51,Jalan Padungan, 93100 Kuching, Malaysia
- Contact
- info@logic-ridge.digital · +60-82-000-1709
- Offer
- Paid programming consulting: scoped architecture assessments, code review sprints, and ongoing technical advisory. Starting fees quoted after intake; SST applied only where registration requires it.
- Payment
- Invoice by bank transfer; milestone billing for project work. Terms on terms of service and refund policy.
- Supply timing
- Written findings or advisory notes delivered per agreed milestone calendar, typically within 5–15 business days of each phase start.
Architecture and review work you can schedule
We document boundaries between services, data ownership, and failure modes so your team can ship without guessing which module should own a transaction. Reviews cover API shapes, dependency direction, and where tests should anchor regressions.
Code review engagements focus on readability, concurrency pitfalls, and security-sensitive paths — not style debates divorced from runtime behavior.
View service lines
Before you sign a build contract, confirm these items
Checklist-led intake keeps advisory hours on decisions that change cost or risk, not on repeating framework tutorials.
- Critical user journeys mapped to owning services and databases
- Rollback plan for schema or API changes that touch paying customers
- Observability hooks named for the metrics you will actually page on
- Review queue for third-party SDKs with network or filesystem access
- Written acceptance criteria for performance under expected peak load
Who benefits from a ridge-line review
Product leads preparing a refactor, platform engineers inheriting a monolith, and CTOs who need an external read on a vendor proposal all use the same intake: repository access or architecture diagrams, plus the risk you are trying to remove.
We are not a substitute for your on-call roster. Engagements stay bounded — you keep delivery ownership while we surface structural issues early.
Engagement rail from first call to written findings
Intake and access
You share repositories, diagrams, or ADR drafts under NDA. We confirm scope, stack, and the decision deadline you are working toward.
Structured review
Architecture passes trace dependencies and failure domains; code review passes target agreed paths with severity-tagged notes.
Readout
We walk through findings on a call and leave a written memo your team can attach to tickets or vendor RFPs.
Optional advisory block
Ongoing advisory hours cover design questions between sprints without reopening the full review scope each week.
Questions teams ask before booking
Which stacks do you cover?
Any stack where we can read the code and run agreed static checks. Web services, data pipelines, and mobile clients are common; exotic embedded firmware is discussed during intake.
How are fees structured?
Fixed-fee sprints for bounded reviews; monthly advisory blocks for recurring questions. A written quote follows intake — nothing is charged until you accept the statement of work.
Where are you based?
We work from 93100 Kuching, Sarawak, with remote readouts for distributed teams across Malaysia and abroad.
Neutral evidence: what a typical sprint delivers
Clients receive a severity-ordered finding list, architecture sketch updates where helpful, and ticket-ready excerpts — not marketing claims or anonymous quotes. Sample deliverable outlines are available on request during intake.
Start intake